Vancouver Law Firm | Thursday round-up
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-8645,single-format-standard,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,qode-theme-ver-11.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2.1,vc_responsive

Thursday round-up

Thursday round-up

Thursday round-up

For the Boston Globe, Travis Andersen reports that in remarks at a Rhode Island law school on Tuesday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg “stated she fears the general public will concern see the federal judiciary as ‘simply another political branch of federal government’ where judges will choose cases based upon celebration association.” Extra protection of Ginsburg’s remarks originates from Michelle Smith at the Associated Press, who reports that the justice “revealed hope that the nation ultimately will overcome the present duration of extreme partisanship, comparing it to the 1950 s, when McCarthyism and the Red Scare led the nation to wander off ‘from its most basic worths.'”


  • In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse recommends that 3 current circumstances where Chief Justice John Roberts has actually voted versus “the dependable conservative set of three of Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr. and Neil M. Gorsuch” might show that “the chief justice reads this greatly freighted political minute as a time to prevent investing the Supreme Court’s minimal capital unnecessarily.”
  • At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog site, Ilya Shapiro and Meggan deWitt advise the justices to examine a cert petition that raises a First Change obstacle to a Berkeley, California, regulation “mandat[ing] that any celebration purchasing or renting cellular phones interact a particular message to every client about radio-frequency direct exposure”; they argue that “courts ought to use stringent examination– implying the federal government requires a great factor and cannot attain its objective any other method– to examine laws that require market individuals to disparage their own items and take part in policy disputes they want to prevent.”
  • In an op-ed for The Sacramento Bee, Erwin Chemerinsky advises the Supreme Court to overrule the most recent variation of the Trump administration’s entry restriction, which he calls “unreasonable in the nations it designates, unlawful in breaching a clear federal statute, and unconstitutional in discriminating on the basis of religious beliefs.”
  • At The National Law Journal (membership or registration needed), Tony Mauro reports that on Tuesday night, President Donald Trump “applauded Neil Gorsuch, ‘a fantastic brand-new Supreme Court justice,’ as he provided his very first State of the Union address prior to an audience that consisted of Gorsuch and 3 other justices: Chief Justice John Roberts Jr., Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.”
  • At the Sentencing Law and Policy blog site, Douglas Berman keeps in mind that “[t] he Supreme Court has 3(!) upcoming arguments worrying the appropriate application of the federal jail term adjustment guidelines that Congress set out in 18 U.S.C. § 3582( c)( 2 ),” observing that “[t] he reality that the SCOTUS has actually chosen to use up 3 cases handling § 3582( c)( 2) highlights the variety of elaborate problems that sentence adjustment movements can provide.”

We count on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or understand of a current (released in the last 2 or 3 days) short article, post, podcast, or op-ed associating with the Supreme Court that you ‘d like us to think about for addition in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] Thank you!

The post Thursday round-up appeared initially on SCOTUSblog.

No Comments

Post A Comment

Follow our blog for the most recent news in the legal representation and lawyer industry.