Vancouver Law Firm | Thursday round-up
7273
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-7273,single-format-standard,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,qode-theme-ver-11.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2.1,vc_responsive
 

Thursday round-up

Thursday round-up

Thursday round-up

The other day the court heard argument in Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, where the justices will choose whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance procedure breaks federal voter-registration laws. Amy Howe has this blog‘s argument analysis, which initially appeared atHowe on the Court For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that the justices “appeared divided” which “[t] wo justices near the court’s ideological center, Anthony Kennedy and Stephen Breyer, appeared most thinking about the practical ramifications of securing ballot rights while upgrading citizen rolls.” Extra protection of the argument originates from Kevin Daley at The Daily Caller, David Savage for the Los Angeles Times, Ariane de Style at CNN, Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Stephen Dinan for The Washington Times, Adam Liptak for The New York Times and Richard Wolf forUSA Today Commentary on the case originates from Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, who keeps in mind that “the bulk, whichever way it chooses, will be making a (possibly unconscious) judgment about which of the 2 objectives [of the laws at issue in the case]– involvement by the qualified or exemption of the disqualified– is more immediate, both typically and now.”

On Tuesday the justices heard argument in a 4th Change case, Collins v. Virginia, where the justices thought about the scope of the vehicle exception to the warrant requirement. Amy Howe examines the argument for this blog; her analysis was very first released at Howe on the Court.

Quickly:

  • The editorial board of The Washington Times prompts the justices to evaluate Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, “a special federalism and residential or commercial property rights case … [whose] implications will extend far beyond the fate of a frog.”
  • At Bloomberg Law, Madison Adler speaks with 5 current alumnae of the lawyer general’s workplace, now in personal practice, who together have argued practically 90 cases at the United States Supreme Court” and who intend to “concentrate on sharing their understanding and assisting young legal representatives the method others assisted them.”
  • Counting to 5(podcast) offers a summary of the cases argued in the very first week of the Court’s January oral arguments, and a fast sneak peek of a couple of cases turning up later on in the term.”
  • At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen provides a rundown on the “state of play” in the numerous partisan-gerrymandering cases at, or heading, to SCOTUS.”

We count on our readers to send us links for our round-up. If you have or understand of a current (released in the last 2 or 3 days) short article, post, podcast, or op-ed associating with the Supreme Court that you ‘d like us to think about for addition in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!

The post Thursday round-up appeared initially on SCOTUSblog.

No Comments

Post A Comment

Follow our blog for the most recent news in the legal representation and lawyer industry.