Vancouver Law Firm | Kagan recuses from immigrant-detention case
3586
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-3586,single-format-standard,qode-quick-links-1.0,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode_grid_1300,qode-theme-ver-11.2,qode-theme-bridge,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.2.1,vc_responsive
 

Kagan recuses from immigrant-detention case

Kagan recuses from immigrant-detention case

Kagan recuses from immigrant-detention case

The fate of a prominent obstacle to the long-lasting detention of immigrants dealing with deportation without a bond hearing appeared less specific tonight, with the statement– made over a month after oral argument– that Justice Elena Kagan would not take part in the case. In a letter sent out to attorneys for the 2 sides inJennings v. Rodriguez, Scott Harris– the clerk of the Supreme Court– suggested that Kagan had actually found out just today that “while working as Lawyer General, she licensed the filing of a pleading in an earlier stage” of the case.

This night’s statement was substantial for 2 factors. Initially, it raises the possibility that, with Kagan recused, the justices might not have the ability to reach a choice on the benefits of the case. The justices initially heard oral argument in the event in November of 2016, prior to Justice Neil Gorsuch was chosen and verified. However– probably due to the fact that they were deadlocked 4 to 4, although there is no chance to understand for sure– the justices purchased reargument last summer season. If the justices had actually hoped that Gorsuch might break the stalemate and enable them to solve the case, Kagan’s lack might toss a wrench into the works.

Tonight’s letter likewise returns attention (no doubt, from the justices’ point of view, unwanted) to the justices’ recusal practices and the treatments they utilize to determine possible disputes. In January of this year, Harris revealed that Chief Justice John Roberts would not take part in a patent case argued almost a month previously. Roberts had actually just recently found out, Harris described, that the petitioner in the event was owned by a business where Roberts owned stock. And in 2016, Justice Stephen Breyer rested on the bench when the court heard oral argument in an energy case although his better half owned stock in a Wisconsin business whose subsidiary became part of the case. Breyer just divulged the dispute in reaction to concerns from Bloomberg News, and his better half offered her shares.

This post was initially released at Howe on the Court.

The post Kagan recuses from immigrant-detention case appeared initially on SCOTUSblog.

No Comments

Post A Comment

Follow our blog for the most recent news in the legal representation and lawyer industry.